On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:57:19 +0100, you wrote:
>Also I think IS_STRING_ITEM is fine, there's no
>reason to add _ONLY since there's no other macro that would do a less
>specific test.
Naming can be bad, misleading and ambiguous by itself. I may not have
come up with something really pretty, but I
Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changelog:
> dlls/user : menu.c
> dlls/user/tests : menu.c
>
> - make menu tests pass on Win9x/ME;
> - rename the macro IS_STRING_ITEM to IS_STRING_ITEM_ONLY, which better
> reflects what it is doing: absence of other item type flags.
Yo
