Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Eric Pouech wrote:
>
>> * Andrew Riedi a écrit :
>>
>>> dlls/user32/tests/cursoricon.c | 201
>>>
>>>
> ...
>
>>> +static void do_child(void)
>>> +{
>>> +WNDCLASS class;
>>> +MS
* On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Eric Pouech wrote:
> * Andrew Riedi a écrit :
> >
> > dlls/user32/tests/cursoricon.c | 201
> >
...
> > +static void do_child(void)
> > +{
> > +WNDCLASS class;
> > +MSG msg;
> > +BOOL ret;
> > +
> > +/* Register a
"Andrew Riedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I made some changes from the last time I talked to AJ - mainly exit code
> stuff.
>
> changelog: user32: Test destroying the cursor of a parent process.
Also there was a complaint that ok() call ersults in the child pro
Andrew Riedi a écrit :
> changelog: user32: Test destroying the cursor of a parent process.
>
> --
> Andrew Riedi
>
>
> From 25a6a6a2eee92c4325d730ff85bd7cdf01bf2ace Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Fr
"Andrew Riedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> changelog: user32: Test destroying the cursor of a parent process.
This doesn't look at all like a suggested way to test interprocess
cursor handles we discussed on IRC: create a process, create a window
in it, use SendMessage