Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> MSDN does not show DdeCientTransaction as returning in res
>> DDE_FNOTPROCESSED. Is this the standard test to see if it is zero?
>> Otherwise an actual test for 0 would be just as good.
>
> Existing tests already check for
"Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MSDN does not show DdeCientTransaction as returning in res
> DDE_FNOTPROCESSED. Is this the standard test to see if it is zero?
> Otherwise an actual test for 0 would be just as good.
Existing tests already check for DDE_FNOTPROCESSED. Using just 0
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> + if (ack) *ack = ERROR_SUCCESS;
>>
>>
>> ok(ret == ERROR_SUCCESS, "Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got %d\n", ret);
>> -todo_wine
>> -{
>> -ok(res == ERROR_SUCCESS, "Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got
>> %08x\n", r
"Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> +++ b/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ static WDML_QUEUE_STATE
> WDML_HandleRequestReply(WDML_CONV* pConv, MSG* msg, WDML
> case WM_DDE_DATA:
> UnpackDDElParam(WM_DDE_DATA, msg->lParam, &uiLo, &
