"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, the existing tests don't fail for me, otherwise they wouldn't be
in the tree.
They didn't fail for me either, but started to fail very recently, I'll
investigate why. In the mean time, could you please commit my patch without
s/FALSE/TRUE/ ch
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be better, yes, but I don't see how adding new tests could avoid
> that if the existing test fail already. I don't see how I can make existing
> tests not fail while adding new ones and not touching any real code. I can
> resend the patch w
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -3217,7 +3295,7 @@ static void test_showwindow(void)
trace("calling ShowWindow( SW_SHOWMAXIMIZE ) for invisible popup window\n");
ShowWindow(hwnd, SW_SHOWMAXIMIZED);
-ok_sequence(WmShowMaxPopupResizedSeq,
"ShowWindow(SW_SHOWMAX
Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -3217,7 +3295,7 @@ static void test_showwindow(void)
>
> trace("calling ShowWindow( SW_SHOWMAXIMIZE ) for invisible popup
> window\n");
> ShowWindow(hwnd, SW_SHOWMAXIMIZED);
> -ok_sequence(WmShowMaxPopupResizedSeq,
> "ShowWindow(S
