> Who feels his patch is correct.
Ivan thinks the patch is correct too.
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hmm...
Rewind is an important part for companies who choose to not publish
all of their source under the (L)GPL (but hopefully do publish smaller
utilities not essential to their core business :-).
As such it might be useful to keep the reference.
Hello Andi,
Many people release
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 06:23:05AM -0400, Tom wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> change dll's back to dlls
>
> Tom
>
> Changelog:
> remove rewind section due to lack of updates
Hmm...
Rewind is an important part for companies who choose to not publish
all of their source under the (L)GPL (but hopefully
