n0dalus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't think we were allowed to use C99 code in wine, for
> compatibility reasons (C++ style comments, etc)? Though I guess using
> C99 headers would still work with pre-C99 compilers whereas C99 code
> features wouldn't.
>
> Any official word on this?
In g
On 10/14/06, David Laight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The C99 type is 'uint32_t' - and should be defined by inttypes.h
I didn't think we were allowed to use C99 code in wine, for
compatibility reasons (C++ style comments, etc)? Though I guess using
C99 headers would still work with pre-C99 com
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:46PM +1000, Robert Lunnon wrote:
> Seems these typedefs have found their way into some of the source files, from
> my recollection these definitions aren't used. What is the official typedef
> for these types;
> IE
> u_int32_t
> uint32_t
>
Seems these typedefs have found their way into some of the source files, from
my recollection these definitions aren't used. What is the official typedef
for these types;
IE
u_int32_t
uint32_t
or
UINT32
