Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2750
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2733
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2721
Your par
Hmm... It still fails today. I have a better idea to fix it, will send
a patch tomorrow. Sorry for introducing the failures :(
(no idea why my client sent this to wine-patches)
On 10/10/13 15:23, Andrew Cook wrote:
> ---
> dlls/kernel32/tests/process.c | 159
> +-
> include/winbase.h | 1 +
> include/winnt.h | 90
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2689
Your par
n increase the timeout value from 120 to something
> like 1800?
Oh, forgot to say: the test failures are most likely caused by side
effects of other tests, I can't reproduce it on our testbots if only
winstation tests are executed, that is why I asked for increasing the
timeout so I c
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Can you please fix the test failures introduced by your previous changes
> first? cf. https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:winstation.html
Sorry for introduced the failures, I'd like to investigate, howe
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2688
Your par
Qian Hong writes:
> ---
> dlls/user32/tests/winstation.c | 57
>
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
Can you please fix the test failures introduced by your previous changes
first? cf. https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:win
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2683
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2682
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2674
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2669
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2667
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2660
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2637
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2634
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2625
Your par
Andrew Cook writes:
> +sprintf(buffer, "\"%s\" tests/process.c ignored \"%s\"", selfname,
> "wait");
> +
> +IOPort = CreateIoCompletionPort(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, NULL, 0, 1);
> +ok(IOPort != INVALID_HANDL
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2608
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2455
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2457
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2434
Your par
p; strcmp(option, "wait") == 0) {
+/* for job object tests */
+Sleep(3000);
+return;
+}
Is it really necessary?
"Utilisateur" (nom commun) :
Mot utilisé par les informaticiens en lieu et place d'"idiot".commit d6f4c73ceb4640332c79561b4e8e7c23619aa669
Author: Francois Gouget
Date: Mon Sep 30 19:26:50 2013 +0200
kernel32/tests: Serial port trigger-level test patch.
nt making them 'const'.
I'm matching the formatting of existing code:
http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/kernel32/tests/file.c#L65
Also, what's the point of not making them const?
+static DWORD WINAPI progress(LARGE_INTEGER TotalFileSize,
+L
t;> +} ;
>>>
>> I don't see a point making them 'const'.
>>
> I'm matching the formatting of existing code:
> http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/kernel32/tests/file.c#L65
> Also, what's the point of not making them const?
>
It&#
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2403
Your par
const BOOL copy_retval;/* expected CopyFileEx result */
>> +const DWORD lastError; /* expected CopyFileEx error code
>> */
>> +} ;
>>
> I don't see a point making them 'const'.
>
I'm matching the formatting of existing
On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
+struct progress_list {
+const DWORD progress_retval_init; /* value to return from progress
routine */
+const BOOL cancel_init;/* value to set Cancel flag to */
+const DWORD progress_retval_end; /* value to return from progr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2392
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2387
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2374
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2345
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2318
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2317
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2315
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2314
Your par
; support. Nvidia has V16U16, AMD supports Q8W8V8U8, at least on
>>> r200. I am working on a more comprehensive converted format
>>> test that tests all supported signed formats with surfaces.
>> Just out of curiosity, do you happen to know if any
>> hardware/driver suppor
am
>> working on a more comprehensive converted format test that tests
>> all supported signed formats with surfaces.
> Just out of curiosity, do you happen to know if any
> hardware/driver supports these for render targets?
I think d3d10+ cards do. This is from memory, I'll
On 23 September 2013 13:29, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Note that Windows drivers disagree on which format they support. Nvidia
> has V16U16, AMD supports Q8W8V8U8, at least on r200. I am working on a
> more comprehensive converted format test that tests all supported signed
> formats w
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2250
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2291
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2292
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2289
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2282
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2281
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2275
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2271
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2269
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2270
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2268
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2266
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2259
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2254
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2253
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2234
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2231
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2233
Your par
On 2013-09-18 11:31, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Thomas Faber wrote:
>> status = pNtWriteFile(hfile, 0, NULL, NULL, &iob, contents,
>> sizeof(contents), &offset, NULL);
>> ok(status == STATUS_PENDING || broken(status == STATUS_SUCCESS) /* see below
>> */, "expected STATUS_PENDING, got %#x\n", stat
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2221
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2214
Your par
Thomas Faber wrote:
> I noticed a couple of tests structured like this:
>
> status = pNtWriteFile(hfile, 0, NULL, NULL, &iob, contents,
> sizeof(contents), &offset, NULL);
> ok(status == STATUS_PENDING || broken(status == STATUS_SUCCESS) /* see
> below */, "exp
Hey Dmitry,
I noticed a couple of tests structured like this:
status = pNtWriteFile(hfile, 0, NULL, NULL, &iob, contents,
sizeof(contents), &offset, NULL);
ok(status == STATUS_PENDING || broken(status == STATUS_SUCCESS) /* see
below */, "expected STATUS_PENDING, got %#x\n&
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
> > +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
> > @@ -1985,6 +1985,22 @@ static void test_read_write(void)
> >
> > bytes = 0xdeadbeef;
> > SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> > +ret = ReadFile
On 09/18/2013 10:53 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c | 41 +
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
index 120fdac..5ae605b 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
+++ b/dlls
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-17 11:39, schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
> --- dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c | 340
> +++ 1 file changed, 340
> insertions(+)
Fyi, I have equivalent tests for d3d8, the behavior is the same.
-
André Hentschel writes:
> ---
> dlls/kernel32/tests/file.c | 84
> ++
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
kernel32_test.exe.so file.c &&
On 9/13/2013 22:26, André Hentschel wrote:
+if (!pCreateFile2)
+{
+win_skip("CreateFile2 is missing\n");
+return;
+}
Should be skip() so it'll show up when running with wine. Not sure how
important it is though.
On 9/13/2013 22:26, André Hentschel wrote:
Sorry, ignore my comment. I missed that we actually have this call
already in wine.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2158
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2155
Your par
Francois Gouget wrote:
> That tree was a bit out of date causing the patch to fail to apply. I
> updated it and rediffed.
I'd appreciate if you could postpone sending this sort of patches
when they could conflict with other pending patches in that area.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2144
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2136
Your par
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-12 13:36, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> I really just meant the typo in the comment.
Ah yes, that should be "distorted".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmai
cted results when just comparing geometry Z vs geometry Z, so a
> game that uses it and doesn't depend on a match with the clear value
> should still work, maybe with reduced precision.
>
> D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL has the same bug as D3DCMP_GREATER.
> D3DCMP_LESSEQUAL works ok as wel
k, maybe with reduced precision.
D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL has the same bug as D3DCMP_GREATER.
D3DCMP_LESSEQUAL works ok as well.
After two hours of trying to find out what the driver does I decided
it's not worth the time and marked the tests broken. It is after all a
no longer maintained Windows
On 12 September 2013 12:23, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> + * On the r500 driver on Windows D3DCMP_GREATER and D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL
> are broken for depth
> + * values > 0.5. The range appears to be distored, apparently an
> incoming value of ~0.875 is
"distorted"?
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2126
Your par
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2121
Your par
Update: Add todo_wine
From 8f464b1ffa384ffba25af5041065c23d21ede041 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jactry Zeng
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:06:02 +0800
Subject: riched20/tests: Add tests for ITextDocument_Save.
To: wine-patches
Reply-To: wine-devel
---
dlls/riched20/tests/richole.c | 102
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2063
Your par
On 06/09/13 17:12, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Andrew Cook wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in | 1 +
>> dlls/ntdll/tests/job.c | 151
>> +++
>> include/winnt.h
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Andrew Cook wrote:
> ---
> dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in | 1 +
> dlls/ntdll/tests/job.c | 151
> +++
> include/winnt.h | 5 ++
> 3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
> create m
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2023
Your par
Andrew Cook writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in b/dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in
> index 10d6674..1903d10 100644
> --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in
> +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ C_SRCS = \
> file.c \
> generat
leted immediately, the function
> > > returns FALSE and the GetLastError function returns ERROR_IO_PENDING,
> > > indicating that the operation is executing in the background."
> >
> > We have the tests for that, MSDN descriptions are proved to be often
> &
gt; "If the overlapped operation cannot be completed immediately, the function
> > returns FALSE and the GetLastError function returns ERROR_IO_PENDING,
> > indicating that the operation is executing in the background."
>
> We have the tests for that, MSDN descriptions are p
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2016
Your par
the GetLastError function returns ERROR_IO_PENDING,
> indicating that the operation is executing in the background."
We have the tests for that, MSDN descriptions are proved to be often incorrect
or incomplete.
--
Dmitry.
Oops, will resend later.
Henri Verbeet schrieb:
>On 5 September 2013 10:42, Stefan Dösinger
>wrote:
>> +if(DDSD->ddsCaps.dwCaps2 & DDSCAPS2_TEXTUREMANAGE)
>Minor formatting error here.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Am Donnerstag, 5. September 2013, 17:52:42 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
> Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 September 2013 10:42:40 you wrote:
> > > Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > > > -ok(!res && GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING, "%d:
> > > > WaitCommEvent
> > > > error %d\n", i, GetLa
On 5 September 2013 10:42, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +if(DDSD->ddsCaps.dwCaps2 & DDSCAPS2_TEXTUREMANAGE)
Minor formatting error here.
Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> On Thursday 05 September 2013 10:42:40 you wrote:
> > Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > > -ok(!res && GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING, "%d: WaitCommEvent
> > > error %d\n", i, GetLastError()); +ok(res || (!res &&
> > > GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING), "%d
On Thursday 05 September 2013 10:42:40 you wrote:
> Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > -ok(!res && GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING, "%d: WaitCommEvent
> > error %d\n", i, GetLastError()); +ok(res || (!res &&
> > GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING), "%d: WaitCommEvent error %d\n", i,
> >
Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> -ok(!res && GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING, "%d: WaitCommEvent
> error %d\n", i, GetLastError());
> +ok(res || (!res && GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING), "%d:
> WaitCommEvent error %d\n", i, GetLastError());
This change looks spurious and unrelat
ted when needed. Tests
> are also added.
>
> Thanks to Matteo Bruni for review and support.
>
> Try 2:
> - update with latest git
Hi, I have a few small nits still, please bear with me...
> ---
> dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c | 80
>
1 - 100 of 5852 matches
Mail list logo
