Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Eric Pouech wrote:
if someone wants to work on this, here's a little comparison of wine's
headers (on left hand side) and windows (on the right hand side).
I only listed the headers I add on both sides.
Cool -- I'll fix commctrl.h.
I have already st
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
[...]
> So, in other words, in Windows, the following program does not compile?
>
> #include
>
> int main() { return 0; }
Yep. In Windows you always have to do:
#include
int main() { return 0; }
And windows.h includes stdarg.h and winbase.h for you
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Eric Pouech wrote:
> if someone wants to work on this, here's a little comparison of wine's
> headers (on left hand side) and windows (on the right hand side).
> I only listed the headers I add on both sides.
Cool -- I'll fix commctrl.h.
--
Dimi.
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With this patch, we can get rid of the stdarg.h
include from winbase.h if it weren't for the
FormatMessage() functions:
DWORD WINAPI FormatMessageA(DWORD,LPCVOID,DWORD,DWORD,LPSTR,DWORD,va_list*);
DWORD WINAPI Fo
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, in other words, in Windows, the following program does not compile?
>
> #include
>
> int main() { return 0; }
No it doesn't, and not only because of stdarg.h, our winbase.h also
includes basetsd.h and windef.h that should be removed too. And
s
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> We have to include stdarg.h everywhere we include winbase.h, about 650
> files at last count. That's why we need some kind of script...
So, in other words, in Windows, the following program does not compile?
#include
int main() { return 0; }
--
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With this patch, we can get rid of the stdarg.h
> include from winbase.h if it weren't for the
> FormatMessage() functions:
>
> DWORD WINAPI FormatMessageA(DWORD,LPCVOID,DWORD,DWORD,LPSTR,DWORD,va_list*);
> DWORD WINAPI FormatMessageW(DW
