"Martin Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any reason you using int* instead of LPINT?
What's better when using LPINT? This are all internal functions and
not exported from shell32.dll.
'INT' has the same size on all platforms and with all compilers in both
win32 and win64, while 'int' is pla
On 07.01.2006 17:52:04 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Saturday, January 7, 2006, 9:30:34 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > - fix folder icon index when read from registry
> > - change "DWORD dwNr" into "int icon_idx" at several places
> Any reason you using int* instead of LPINT?
What's better
Saturday, January 7, 2006, 9:30:34 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Changelog:
> - fix folder icon index when read from registry
> - change "DWORD dwNr" into "int icon_idx" at several places
Any reason you using int* instead of LPINT?
> Index: shell32_main.h
> ===
"Martin Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any thing wrong with this patch?
Well, yes, you noted it yourself:
>> +DWORD dwNr; /*TODO: change to int type */
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any thing wrong with this patch?
On 31.12.2005 21:31:25 Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Changelog:
> fix folder icon index when read from registry
> Index: folders.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/shell32/folders.c,v
> retrieving revi
