> ^ is bitwise-XOR, so it is more like if(This->navpane.show != show_navpane),
> which looks to be what he intended.
Ah, yes 'tis. Perhaps it's a deficiency of my brain, but when reading
bit-twiddling code, I remember the bitwise operators, but when reading
logical code, I tend to stick to the bo
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 19:32, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> Hi David, I know this was committed already, but something caught my
>> eye that I didn't understand:
>>
>> + if(This->navpane.show ^ show_navpane)
>>
>> Is this a cute way to write if(T
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi David, I know this was committed already, but something caught my
> eye that I didn't understand:
>
> + if(This->navpane.show ^ show_navpane)
>
> Is this a cute way to write if(This->navpane.show && show_navpane) ?
> If so, why ^ rather tha
Hi David, I know this was committed already, but something caught my
eye that I didn't understand:
+if(This->navpane.show ^ show_navpane)
Is this a cute way to write if(This->navpane.show && show_navpane) ?
If so, why ^ rather than &&?
Thanks,
--Juan
