On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
> Jackpot. This version ran 10,000 times without a glitch on the dual-core
> machine.
Great! Thank you so much for helping me to track this down.
Erich Hoover
ehoo...@mines.edu
From: Erich Hoover
> Hmm, interesting - thanks for taking a look into this, I really appreciate
> it. I ran a test on a different XP SP3 machine here (this time a dual-core)
> and it worked just fine. So, at first I thought this must be an issue to
> the combination of multi-core and Windows 7.
>
:00:00 2001
From: Erich Hoover
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:32:02 -0700
Subject: shdocvw: Implement IWebBrowser::ExecWB and IWebBrowser::QueryStatusWB.
---
dlls/shdocvw/tests/webbrowser.c | 195 +++
dlls/shdocvw/webbrowser.c | 67 +-
2 files changed
From: Greg Geldorp
> From: Erich Hoover
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Looking at http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shdocvw:webbrowser.html,
> > > the shdocvw:webbrowser test doesn't have a history of occasional
> > > crashes. There are a few failures, bu
From: Erich Hoover
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
> > ...
> > Looking at http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shdocvw:webbrowser.html, the
> > shdocvw:webbrowser test doesn't have a history of occasional crashes.
> > There are a few failures, but none of them are due to access
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
> ...
> Looking at http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shdocvw:webbrowser.html, the
> shdocvw:webbrowser test doesn't have a history of occasional crashes.
> There are a few failures, but none of them are due to access violations.
> Which kind of
From: Erich Hoover
> I've successfully run essentially the same set of tests I've submitted
> here several times and, of course, when I finally submit I run into
> this error. I re-ran this patch manually to see if I accidentally
> messed something up and it succeeded:
> https://testbot.winehq.org
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Marvin wrote:
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.wine
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8633
Your paranoid android.
