> That's why the version checks are unnecessary. Apps that check the
> version won't use these functions anyway, and apps that don't check
> will just work. There's no point at all in adding extra checks to
> deliberately break a function, unless of course an app really depends
> on the broken beha
Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You shouldn't do that kind of preventive version check, you should
> > always call the function and then deal with failures appropriately.
>
> Sorry I am a little dense. If both functions are just n
--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You shouldn't do that kind of preventive version check, you should
> always call the function and then deal with failures appropriately.
Sorry I am a little dense. If both functions are just no-ops on Win9x then the
app should not be
calling th
Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +BOOL WINAPI DelayedMove(LPCWSTR lpExistingFileName, LPCWSTR lpNewFileName)
> +{
> +if (OsVersionInfo.dwPlatformId != VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT)
> +{
> +SetLastError(ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED);
> +return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> +r