On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> What's the reason for checking the HeapFree here? Or what's the reason
> for doing
> >> it at all?
> >>
> >
> > To show that the value returned is not in the hea
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the reason for checking the HeapFree here? Or what's the reason for
>> doing
>> it at all?
>>
>
> To show that the value returned is not in the heap.
Isn't any of HeapValidate or HeapSize better in that case?
--
Dmitry.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I'm looking into a crash of the setupapi/parser test on Vista.
>
> It crashes in this piece:
>
> 465 ret = HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, (LPVOID)field );
> 466 ok( !ret, "Expected HeapFree
Hi James,
I'm looking into a crash of the setupapi/parser test on Vista.
It crashes in this piece:
465 ret = HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, (LPVOID)field );
466 ok( !ret, "Expected HeapFree to fail\n" );
467 ok( GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER,
468
