On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:46:00PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Juan Lang writes:
>
> > Is this better? This trades a single call to sched_getaffinity per
> > process to one every time the process affinity is queried. This seems
> > safer, since a non-Wine process can also change a proces
Juan Lang writes:
> Is this better? This trades a single call to sched_getaffinity per
> process to one every time the process affinity is queried. This seems
> safer, since a non-Wine process can also change a process's affinity,
> but it can have higher overhead.
Yes, that's better. But AFAI
