On February 19, 2004 07:52 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, it works perfectly, send it to wine-patches.
Alexandre fixed it another way already. Get the latest tree.
--
Dimi.
> Try the following patch (compiles, but not tested - I don't use msvcrt).
Thanks for the patch, it works perfectly, send it to wine-patches.
Ivan.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:27, Eric Pouech wrote:
> Ivan Leo Murray-Smith a écrit :
> > Apparently there is a problem with wine's scanf. this code
> the main issue is that MSVCRT_scanf calls MSVCRT_fscanf while it thinks
> it's actually fvscanf. All the scanf internal functions should be
> implemented
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Eric Pouech wrote:
> the main issue is that MSVCRT_scanf calls MSVCRT_fscanf while it thinks
> it's actually fvscanf. All the scanf internal functions should be
> implemented as vscanf not scanf
Eric, how about a patch for the Janitorial page, so we can keep
track of this i
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith a écrit :
Apparently there is a problem with wine's scanf. this code
the main issue is that MSVCRT_scanf calls MSVCRT_fscanf while it thinks
it's actually fvscanf. All the scanf internal functions should be
implemented as vscanf not scanf
A+
Apparently there is a problem with wine's scanf. this code
#include
int main()
{
int a;
printf ("Type a number\n");
scanf ("%d", &a);
printf ("You've entered %d\n", a);
return 0;
}
works as expected on linux, but on wine returns
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ivan]$ wine test.exe
Type a number
5
You've ente