Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2012, 13:31:00 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> DOSBOX and DOSEMU can fall back to full emulation today, so vm86 not
> strictly required anymore these days. Speed is probably no longer an
> issue ;)
No, speed is still an issue. DOSBOX is too slow to run Settlers 2 and Screamer
2(aka
David Laight writes:
> Does wine support running of 16bit windows apps?
> If so does it rely on the underlying OS having support
> for 'virtual 8086 emulation'?
>
> I'm thinking of removing the VM86 support from NetBSD,
> and wine is about the only likley user.
Wine is not going to use vm86 on N
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:06:23PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > > Does wine support running of 16bit windows apps?
> > > If so does it rely on the underlying OS having sup
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > Does wine support running of 16bit windows apps?
> > If so does it rely on the underlying OS having support
> > for 'virtual 8086 emulation'?
> >
> > I'm thinking of removin
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Laight wrote:
> Does wine support running of 16bit windows apps?
> If so does it rely on the underlying OS having support
> for 'virtual 8086 emulation'?
>
> I'm thinking of removing the VM86 support from NetBSD,
> and wine is about the only likley user.
>
>
Does wine support running of 16bit windows apps?
If so does it rely on the underlying OS having support
for 'virtual 8086 emulation'?
I'm thinking of removing the VM86 support from NetBSD,
and wine is about the only likley user.
David
--
David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk