I'll take you advice from now and I apologize for any annoyance caused
by my previous emails.
I would also thank all the people who took time to review our patches
and sent me their comments/remarks.
Regards,
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
Vitaliy
No, that adds more pollution to the place which should not have it.
Please send all patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you think that
all of your patches need work, then don't send them at all. Do this
extra work. And when you have a patch that _you_ think is as good as it
can be, send it to [EMAIL PR
yes but I prefer sending patches first to the devel list for comments.
Once no major issue is raised, I send it to the patches list. I think
this helps prevent polluting the patches list.
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
Patches should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
pgpiFsHZzRqcO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
007 17:04:46 +0200
Subject: rsaenh: fix critical bug in read_key_container
---
dlls/rsaenh/rsaenh.c | 11 +++
dlls/rsaenh/tests/rsaenh.c | 19 +++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/rsaenh/rsaenh.c b/dlls/rsaenh/rsaenh.c
inde
