On Wednesday 05 April 2006 00:46, Phil Krylov wrote:
> This is only true for RichEdit 2.0 - later versions have better table
> support, while our current implementation is approximately at 2.0 level.
Perhaps, but the problem of CHARRANGE being insufficient to describe the start
and end of renderi
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:46:18 +1000
Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + * *** Notes on tables ***
> + *
> + * The CHARRANGE structure passed in the FORMATRANGE structure is not
> + * sufficient to deal with tables, where we would need information on the
> + * start position for text in each co
Hi Troy,
any chance you can also provide a conformance test,
however trivial?
(Also, from reading
http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware3/default.asp?cmd=show&ixPost=97326&ixReplies=5
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben%3B129860
http://www.codeproject.com/printing/richeditpr
