Re: richedit: Documented paragraph border widths are in points not pixels.

2010-03-01 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Sun, 28/2/10, Andrew Eikum wrote: > I'd be very surprised if git is modifying your patches > without telling you.  It's probably Gmail trying to be > clever.  Telling git-imap-send to send as an attachment > (--attach) might fix the issue.  Or, if you're already > doing that, maybe turning

Re: richedit: Documented paragraph border widths are in points not pixels.

2010-02-28 Thread Dylan Smith
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Eikum wrote: > I'd be very surprised if git is modifying your patches without telling you. >  It's probably Gmail trying to be clever.  Telling git-imap-send to send as > an attachment (--attach) might fix the issue.  Or, if you're already doing > that, mayb

Re: richedit: Documented paragraph border widths are in points not pixels.

2010-02-28 Thread Andrew Eikum
On 02/28/2010 02:01 PM, Dylan Smith wrote: I have been using git imap-send to upload the patch from gmail's draft folder so that I could send manually after looking over everything, but all the text piped into git imap-send has unix line endings. I am not sure if gmail is changing the line endin

Re: richedit: Documented paragraph border widths are in points not pixels.

2010-02-28 Thread Dylan Smith
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:09 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > git apply complains about whitespace errors: > 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:10: > trailing whitespace. > int ME_GetParaBorderWidth(ME_Context *c, int flags); > 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-wi

Re: richedit: Documented paragraph border widths are in points not pixels.

2010-02-28 Thread James McKenzie
Dylan Smith wrote: > The border widths documented by msdn are in points which are 72 dpi, which > is not equivalent to pixels (normally 96 dpi). I pre-converted all the > border widths to 96 dpi resolution since this avoids needed to store > fractions, and often avoids the need for convertion to th