"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes in gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel:
> On 6/22/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James Hawkins wrote:
> > > Probably, L"" is not portable, and you have to use:
> > >
> > > static const WHCAR string[] = {'s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
> > >
> >
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> In Linux, L"" makes 4 byte character strings (if not using explicit
> -fshort-wchar). Also, if the user then calls wc* functions from glibc,
> they will use 4 byte characters.
>
> It is all to avoid confusion.
>
> Ciao, Marcus
Interestingly, it looks like, in one standar
James Hawkins wrote:
To be as portable as possible, we code to the lowest common
denominator. Not all compilers support L"". We adhere to C89, but I
can't remember what it says about L"", if anything. The point is that
WCHAR blah[] ={...} will work for every compiler.
wchar_t is an int on s
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > Probably, L"" is not portable, and you have to use:
> >
> > static const WHCAR string[] = {'s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
> >
> I'm just curious: not arguing, ;) but Plauger says, in "The Standard C
> Library"
James Hawkins wrote:
> To be as portable as possible, we code to the lowest common
> denominator. Not all compilers support L"". We adhere to C89, but I
> can't remember what it says about L"", if anything. The point is that
> WCHAR blah[] ={...} will work for every compiler.
>
>From what I ca
On 6/22/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
> Probably, L"" is not portable, and you have to use:
>
> static const WHCAR string[] = {'s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
>
I'm just curious: not arguing, ;) but Plauger says, in "The Standard C
Library" (1992, p. 219): "You wri
James Hawkins wrote:
> Probably, L"" is not portable, and you have to use:
>
> static const WHCAR string[] = {'s','t','r','i','n','g',0};
>
I'm just curious: not arguing, ;) but Plauger says, in "The Standard C
Library" (1992, p. 219): "You write a wide character constant as, for
example, L'x'. I
On 6/22/06, Krzysztof Foltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch seems to have been overlooked or rejected - yet I do not see
any reason being mentioned.
Was it rejected because of use of L"" syntax?
Probably, L"" is not portable, and you have to use:
static const WHCAR string[] = {'s','t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ memcpy(dest, L"\r", nEndChars*2);
Wide character strings aren't portable. Please use something like:
static const WCHAR szsr[] = { '\r', 0 };
Mike
