Re: rfc: refactoring msxml3 to get rid of aggregation

2008-11-02 Thread Michael Karcher
Hi Jacek. > Hi Michael, > Casting function in vtbl is not an acceptable solution. If you have to > do that, it means that the design is bad. So in short that means that using deriving for objects to implement derived interfaces is not possible in Wine, as it is not cleanly implementable in plain

Re: rfc: refactoring msxml3 to get rid of aggregation

2008-11-02 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Michael, Michael Karcher wrote: > Any oppions on that? I think other solution would be better. There is no reason for xmlnode object to implement any interface. All its child objects already have IXMLDOMNode interface. xmlnode could be a common struct stored by child objects and there could