On Do, 2007-10-11 at 08:45 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> int num = 0;
> +intpos1 = -1 , pos2 = -1;
You mix SPACE and TAB.
Thanks
(The updated test works in w2k here)
--
By by ... Detlef
On Thursday 11 October 2007 08:45:40 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hmm, windows has more processes running of course.
>
> Can you revert the above and use this simpler check?
> (and try running it some times to see randomness, if any.)
This version succeeds repeatedly, while starting several new
proce
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:20:49AM +0200, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2007 23:25:06 Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > BUT I would like to test run it on windows first, so can someone
> > please run following patch against a real Windows?
>
> toolhelp.c:145: Test failed: new process at
On Monday 08 October 2007 23:25:06 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> BUT I would like to test run it on windows first, so can someone
> please run following patch against a real Windows?
toolhelp.c:145: Test failed: new process at position 26 in snapshot, expected 1.
toolhelp.c:146: Test failed: this proc
Hi,
I have a game (Last Chaos USA by AeriaGames) which does not start up
the main game due to a bug in its toolhelp snaphot handling.
It does:
h = CreateToolhelp32Snapshot();
Process32First(h, &x);
while (Process32Next(h,&x)) {
/* check x */
}
So i
