Re: relay log problem

2010-01-29 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Friday 29 January 2010 01:20:24 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > On 29 January 2010 00:21, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > > On 01/28/2010 10:59 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: > >> On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter > >> > >>  wrote: > >>> Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? > >> > >> Yeah,

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Michael Stefaniuc writes: > Anyway the usage of write(2) in NTDLL_dbg_vprintf() is *wrong* as it > doesn't check for short writes nor errors. It is good enough for debug > output and better than using the FILE * functions but not good enough to > prevent interleaving. It even introduces an opport

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-29 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Michael Stefaniuc writes: > >> Incorrect. Wine doesn't use write(2) but vfprintf(3) which operates on >> FILE handles; the output is buffered aka a vfprintf call won't translate >> 1:1 to a write(2) system call. But even if it would directly use >> write(2), that syste

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Michael Stefaniuc writes: > Incorrect. Wine doesn't use write(2) but vfprintf(3) which operates on > FILE handles; the output is buffered aka a vfprintf call won't translate > 1:1 to a write(2) system call. But even if it would directly use > write(2), that system call isn't atomic. A lot of peop

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-29 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Ken Thomases wrote: > On Jan 28, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > >> On 01/28/2010 10:59 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: >>> On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter >>> wrote: Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? >>> Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround y

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Ken Thomases
On Jan 28, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > On 01/28/2010 10:59 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: >> On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter >> wrote: >>> Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? >>> >> Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" >> (append) i

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 29 January 2010 00:21, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > On 01/28/2010 10:59 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: >> >> On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter >>  wrote: >>> >>> Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? >>> >> Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" >> (append)

winefixme/wineoops (Was: Re: relay log problem)

2010-01-28 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
On 01/29/2010 12:23 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 1/29/2010 02:21, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: For the winefixme collector i have the luxury to be able to ignore the mangled output lines; not so much for the wineoops crash collector. Btw, are they ready and hosted somewhere already? winefixme is "

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 1/29/2010 02:21, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: For the winefixme collector i have the luxury to be able to ignore the mangled output lines; not so much for the wineoops crash collector. Btw, are they ready and hosted somewhere already? bye michael

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
On 01/28/2010 10:59 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter wrote: Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" (append) instead of ">" to redirect to the file. You'll still need the "2>&1" to red

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 29 January 2010 00:14, Ben Klein wrote: > 2010/1/29 Henri Verbeet : >> On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter >> wrote: >>> Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? >>> >> Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" >> (append) instead of ">" to redirect to th

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Klein
2010/1/29 Henri Verbeet : > On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter wrote: >> Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? >> > Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" > (append) instead of ">" to redirect to the file. You'll still need the > "2>&1" to redirect stde

Re: relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 28 January 2010 22:39, Stefan Leichter wrote: > Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? > Yeah, that's a known problem. As a workaround you can use ">>" (append) instead of ">" to redirect to the file. You'll still need the "2>&1" to redirect stderr to stdout, of course.

relay log problem

2010-01-28 Thread Stefan Leichter
Hello, does anyone notice a problem that the lines of the logging are written over each other as in the attached log? My system has an AMD Phenom(tm) II X2 550 Processor on a NVIDIA GeForce 8300 Chipset running running Debian Lenny 32 bit Is this a know problem? Is a work around available? --