On Apr 4, 2005 4:26 AM, Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Sunday 03 Apr 2005 23:57, you wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 2005 5:17 PM, Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > By the look of it, the bug is that create_test_entries() creates the
> > > three TestN keys (N=1..3), but
Hi James,
On Sunday 03 Apr 2005 23:57, you wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 5:17 PM, Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the look of it, the bug is that create_test_entries() creates the
> > three TestN keys (N=1..3), but doesn't clean them after.
>
> We use the values created in create_test_entr
On Apr 3, 2005 5:17 PM, Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the look of it, the bug is that create_test_entries() creates the three
> TestN keys (N=1..3), but doesn't clean them after.
We use the values created in create_test_entries() throughout the
whole test so this is the correct beha
Hi James,
On Sunday 03 Apr 2005 22:43, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 4:33 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see what's happening now. The original author of test_enum_value
> either didn't know about the 3 existing keys (maybe they were added
> later) or he thought they wou
On Apr 3, 2005 4:33 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been fixing tests that fail on all of Win9x/XP/2003, and I've
> found a difference between the way we insert new values. What happens
> in advapi32/tests/registry.c - test_enum_value is that we already have
> 3 values
Hi,
I've been fixing tests that fail on all of Win9x/XP/2003, and I've
found a difference between the way we insert new values. What happens
in advapi32/tests/registry.c - test_enum_value is that we already have
3 values created under the key Wine\\Test before the test starts.
Then we make four
