Hello
for this one, I have a patch in my tree.
I will send it after my patches for the spherical harmonics.
Nozomi
>Hi Roland,
>
>I'm not exactly sure what your goal is... but there is a rule one patch per
>mail only! There is likely no chance to get something like that mixture
>committed.
>
Hi Roland,
I'm not exactly sure what your goal is... but there is a rule one patch
per mail only! There is likely no chance to get something like that
mixture committed.
You may have a look here:
http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches
On 18.07.2013 01:23, Roland Haeder wrote:
+HRESULT D3
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
>
> Yaron Shahrabani
There's a few problems...
A) Please send one patch per email.
B) The patches are incorrect:
0002-Arabic-Patch.patch:
---
programs/notepad/Makefile.in |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --
Louis wrote:
> Hi, apparently none of my patches is making it into git, nor did i recieve
> any response from Alexandre about what's wrong with them. I guess i'm kind of
> "blacklisted"
I don't think so. LOTS of people, me included, have trouble getting
patches into git. You just have to have
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Mathias Kosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Sirs and Madams,
>
> while configuration "The Bat!" for wine I had to fix some issues with
> Wine (version 1.1.1). I am now sending you the patches, because I was
> told so in Bugzilla. I hope, they can be applied to
Hi Daniel,
A few comments regarding the patches. First of all you should use a single
patch file for each patch (this makes tracking patches easier). Now over to
the patches.
Regarding wineosxtypeerrors.patch:
- 'GLenum' should be 'unsigned int' instead of int. I don't understand why
the cast
On 4/11/07, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, I've spent the last days looking into this matter and I'd like to
suggest a way to get it started. So. This is the plan:
Now I see the emails. I found it in the gmail trash. I don't know why
it was there. Anyway yesterday was a long
Felix Nawothnig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Okay, I've spent the last days looking into this matter and I'd like to
>suggest a way to get it started. So. This is the plan:
>
>1. In winex11.drv:
>
>-INT X11DRV_LockDIBSection(X11DRV_PDEVICE *physDev, INT req, BOOL lossy)
>+HBITMAP X11DRV_LockDIBSect
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
2. Export LockDIBSection/Unlock to gdi32.
Adding more exports is not nice but there really is no way around
that, right?
No, LockDIBSection is a driver internal detail, gdi32 has no business
knowing about this.
In my code the call to LockDIBSection serves two p
Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2. Export LockDIBSection/Unlock to gdi32.
>
>Adding more exports is not nice but there really is no way around
>that, right?
No, LockDIBSection is a driver internal detail, gdi32 has no business
knowing about this.
> 3. Move dc->funcs to dc->
On 4/11/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That'd be me apparently.
http://code.google.com/soc/wine/about.html
Jesse
--
Tom Wickline
Respectable computing - Linux/FOSS
On 4/11/07, Matt Finnicum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year:
It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts,
but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's
obligation is do do what they said they wo
As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year:
It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts,
but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's
obligation is do do what they said they would, so if you complete
their proposal for them it doe
Oops. Forgot the patches. Here they are.
And the very second I sent the last E-Mail the DIB engine work got
accepted as a SoC project (by someone else)... I've no idea what this
means to me. Someone clarify please. :)
diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c
index 00bf
Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are some patches that are attached in the bugzilla.
> They havent sent to wine-patches mailing list.
> Can I mail them to the mailing list on their behalf?
> I have asked them to submit to the mailing list.
> The patches are submitted about 2 months back.
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this one should be added to windows.h (maybe it's not the best
place for it, but it works):
#define stricmp strcasecmp
This define is not present in the Platform SDK. It is a by-product of
using glibc instead of msvcrt as your C library. If you us
David Saez Padros wrote:
This line should be added to commctrl.h:
#define ListView_GetOrigin(hwndLV, ppt) \
(BOOL)SNDMSG((hwndLV), LVM_GETORIGIN, (WPARAM)0, (LPARAM)ppt)
I've submitted a patch for this.
this one should be added to windows.h (maybe it's not the best
place for it, but it w
On Sunday 11 September 2005 19:04, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Robert Lunnon wrote:
> >This might be a moot point. In general it isn't possible to copyright an
> >Interface definition under most copyright jurisdictions (other wise
> > merely using the interface in your own program would be a copyright
Robert Lunnon wrote:
This might be a moot point. In general it isn't possible to copyright an
Interface definition under most copyright jurisdictions (other wise merely
using the interface in your own program would be a copyright violation). So
the exact header "expression" is protected IE
On Sunday 11 September 2005 04:25, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Eric Pouech wrote:
> > SDK is available on msdn (web site I mean) with most of the information
> > we need.
>
> No, MSDN has the documentation, and only the documentation, subject to
> these TOS
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.a
Eric Pouech wrote:
SDK is available on msdn (web site I mean) with most of the information
we need.
No, MSDN has the documentation, and only the documentation, subject to these TOS
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sdkintro/sdkintro/legal_information_sdk.asp
http:
Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
Eric Pouech wrote:
from EULA:
1.1 General License Grant. Microsoft grants to you a personal,
non-exclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free license to use the
Software, and to make and use five (5) copies of the Software on one
or more computers located at your premis
Eric Pouech wrote:
from EULA:
1.1 General License Grant. Microsoft grants to you a personal,
non-exclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free license to use the
Software, and to make and use five (5) copies of the Software on one
or more computers located at your premises solely for the purpose
Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
Eric Pouech wrote:
Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
Is anything wrong with these?
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020521.html
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020550.html
DDK isn't public information. Do we want Wine
Eric Pouech wrote:
Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
Is anything wrong with these?
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020521.html
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020550.html
DDK isn't public information. Do we want Wine tree to be tainted by
non
25 matches
Mail list logo
