Re: Wine Kernel Handle Support Module

2007-08-09 Thread Michael Ost
I know there is some discussion of what should be put in the kernel module, so I am asking for advice on what to implement... ie. just handles, everything wineserver does, etc. The first question is: Why do you want to do that and what specifically do you want to achieve? A smal

Re: Wine Kernel Handle Support Module

2007-08-08 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:10:08PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > > > I know there is some discussion of what should be put in the kernel > > > module, so I am asking for advice on what to implement... ie. just > > > handles, everything wineserver does, etc. > > > > The first question is: > > Why do

Re: Wine Kernel Handle Support Module

2007-08-08 Thread Kuba Ober
> > I know there is some discussion of what should be put in the kernel > > module, so I am asking for advice on what to implement... ie. just > > handles, everything wineserver does, etc. > > The first question is: > Why do you want to do that and what specifically do > you want to ach

re: Wine Kernel Handle Support Module

2007-08-08 Thread Dan Kegel
keane wrote: > I am not sure if this is the direction that some people want to take, > because I am sure this modification of the IDT would be considered > improper by kernel types but come on, I mean i386 has something like > 200 software interrupts and linux uses only one. Do not anger the kerne

Re: Wine Kernel Handle Support Module

2007-08-08 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:09:46AM -0400, James Keane wrote: > I have been working on something that might be useful for kernel > integration. It is a way for wine to create its own interrupt, so > that a wine server/kernel/handle/whatever function could be called > from userspace with a simple IN