On 2/17/2010 23:32, Seth Shelnutt wrote:
2010/2/16 André Hentschel mailto:n...@dawncrow.de>>
Just some ideas by me:
Dan Kegel schrieb:
> Seth Shelnutt wrote:
>> I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
>
> It's waiting around for somebody to have time to s
2010/2/16 André Hentschel
> Just some ideas by me:
>
>
>
> Dan Kegel schrieb:
> > Seth Shelnutt wrote:
> >> I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
> >
> > It's waiting around for somebody to have time to start it
> > up again. It's ugly code, written in shell and perl, which
> > sca
Just some ideas by me:
Dan Kegel schrieb:
> Seth Shelnutt wrote:
>> I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
>
> It's waiting around for somebody to have time to start it
> up again. It's ugly code, written in shell and perl, which
> scares most people off. One has to wonder whethe
Seth Shelnutt wrote:
> I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
It's waiting around for somebody to have time to start it
up again. It's ugly code, written in shell and perl, which
scares most people off. One has to wonder whether it
shouldn't be done over again using buildbot, just t
