Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2432
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2433
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2430
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2431
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2429
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23747
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23751
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23748
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23750
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23749
Your paranoid android
Hi Francois,
> -/* if we set the bufferpointer to NULL here UrlUnescape fails and
> string gets not converted */
> +/* if we set the buffer pointer to NULL here UrlUnescape fails and
> the string is not converted */
for consistency with the other buffer pointer comments and be
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21742
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13664
Your paranoid android
Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> [...]
>>> -rem Removing non-existent directory
>>> +rem Removing nonexistent directory
> [...]
>> There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
>> and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "non-"
On 8/3/11 4:23 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
-rem Removing non-existent directory
+rem Removing nonexistent directory
[...]
There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "no
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> > -rem Removing non-existent directory
> > +rem Removing nonexistent directory
[...]
> There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
> and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "non-" (sometimes
> even "non ") so I
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:36, Francois Gouget wrote:
> diff --git a/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> b/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> index eb79fb2..be1eead 100644
> --- a/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> +++ b/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ mkdir f
2008/12/28 Francois Gouget :
> -FIXME("No free constant found to load environemnt bump mapping
> matrix into the shader. texbem instruction will not apply bump mapping\n");
> +FIXME("No free constant found to load environement bump mapping
> matrix into the shader. texbem
On Thursday 24 January 2008 23:25:53 Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > > English, at least in England.
> > > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
> >
> > I've never seen i
On Jan 24, 2008 4:25 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > > English, at least in England.
> > > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
> >
> > I've neve
On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > English, at least in England.
> > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
>
> I've never seen it used personally.
My test for whether a word is commonly used is
On Jan 24, 2008 1:37 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin wrote:
> >-/* centred vertically and in the right side of the password edit
> control */
> >+/* centered vertically and in the right side of the password
> edit control */
>
> I never thought about it before, but "centre
Austin wrote:
>-/* centred vertically and in the right side of the password edit
control */
>+/* centered vertically and in the right side of the password
edit control */
I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
English, at least in England.
Guess I need to add that
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, H. Verbeet wrote:
> On 07/12/2007, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- a/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> > - * out. The nvidia driver only does that if the parameter is inout
> > instead of out, hence the
> > - *
On 07/12/2007, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> +++ b/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> - * out. The nvidia driver only does that if the parameter is inout
> instead of out, hence the
> - * inout.
> + * out. The nvidia driver only d
25 matches
Mail list logo
