Hi Michael,
2008/7/8 Michael Karcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Montag, den 07.07.2008, 18:22 -0700 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> Reworks the code so that the lock is taking in the called procedures now.
>
>> +InputPin *pin = (InputPin *)pTransformFilter->ppPins[0];
>> +
>> +EnterCriticalSe
Am Montag, den 07.07.2008, 18:22 -0700 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Reworks the code so that the lock is taking in the called procedures now.
> +InputPin *pin = (InputPin *)pTransformFilter->ppPins[0];
> +
> +EnterCriticalSection(&pTransformFilter->csFilter);
> +if (pTransformFilter->s
"Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It won't violate the locking rules, since this is the way it is
> designed. If you look at OutputPin_SendSample, you will see it takes
> the critical section to obtain whether the pin is connected to
> something, and if it is, it will send the data
Hi Alexandre,
2008/7/7 Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c b/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
>> index d877930..22bfb87 100644
>> --- a/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
>> +++ b/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
>> @@ -186,7 +
"Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c b/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
> index d877930..22bfb87 100644
> --- a/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
> +++ b/dlls/quartz/acmwrapper.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,9 @@ static HRESULT
> ACMWrapper_ProcessSampleData(TransformFilterI
