-devel@winehq.org; Marcus Meissner
Subject: Re: pch support
Hi,
On 1/13/06, Rolf Kalbermatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This solution has been starting to form in my mind as well. It is even
> portable to MSVC it seems with a few small modifications to
winapi/msvcmaker.
I came up with
-devel@winehq.org; Marcus Meissner
Subject: Re: pch support
Hi,
On 1/13/06, Rolf Kalbermatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This solution has been starting to form in my mind as well. It is even
> portable to MSVC it seems with a few small modifications to
winapi/msvcmaker.
I came up
Hi,
On 1/13/06, Rolf Kalbermatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This solution has been starting to form in my mind as well. It is even
> portable to MSVC it seems with a few small modifications to winapi/msvcmaker.
I came up with a much more generic solution that will work on all
compilers and doe
> Hmm, perhaps use a CFLAGS "-include autogenerated.h" trick.
>
> Generate "autogenerated.h" by collecting all possible includes via
> a script on "make depend", then force it into every file with
> -include autogenerated.h (previously compiled to pch).
>
> Has the advantage that the magic is al
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:02:42PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> > > Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> > >
> > > > We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS,
> > it's been
> > > > working very well and relia
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:02:42PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> > Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> >
> > > We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS,
> it's been
> > > working very well and reliable. Compiling ReactOS is *a lot*
> > > faster with
> > > PCH enabled.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:02:42PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>
> > We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS, it's been
> > working very well and reliable. Compiling ReactOS is *a lot*
> > faster with
> > PCH enabled.
>
> Basically what I get in
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS, it's been
> working very well and reliable. Compiling ReactOS is *a lot*
> faster with
> PCH enabled.
Basically what I get in MSVC 6 when modifing a header somewhere and PCH is
enabled is that MSVC keeps moc
blem with it and should
compile everything properly without any additional hacks (without PCH
support of course).
- Thomas
Hello Steven,
> Alexandre did not like the needed changes required to add support for
> this but I figured I would throw it out for debate anyway in case
> anyone else can make him change his mind (duck). The issue is he does
> not like needing a single header per-program or per dll. After doing
>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
I've had issues with header changes with MSVC precompiled headers too.
Sometimes the only solution is to disable precompiled headers and delete
the pch file. For fairness I have to say that I'm still using MSVC 6 so
there is a good chance that more r
o be
compilable on many different systems besides standard Linux, has certainly
a lot more possible difficulties with header conflicts than most other
systems.
> problem:
> ccache works great for speeding up compiles but seems to still have
> issue with some header changes. Also the ReactOS
eally want to
add pch support to the Wine dlls that are shared so the job falls to
me to sell it to Wine.
Solution:
Below are the benchmarks from my box and a patch. Simply patch your
tree and then ./configure and cd to the regedit folder and do a 'time
make','make clean','
13 matches
Mail list logo
