Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:56:56 +0100, Sir Ferenc Wagner scribed thus:
>
>>> I think he did but... SMTP is a horrible protocol. HTTP
>>> is sweet. :-)
>>
>> They got complicated the same way when the machine is behind
>> a firewall or proxy, I am afraid. It
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think he did but... SMTP is a horrible protocol. HTTP
is sweet. :-)
They got complicated the same way when the machine is behind
a firewall or proxy, I am afraid. It's a pity Windows does
not have a standard mailer...
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:18:20AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am making slow progress with this thing. It grew sort of
> usable: can be cross compiled and run to produce sensible
> output (tested on XP only). Present questions:
Ahh! Progress, sweet! :-)
> 4. Did Jon Bright co
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:56:56 +0100, Sir Ferenc Wagner scribed thus:
>> I think he did but... SMTP is a horrible protocol. HTTP
>> is sweet. :-)
>
> They got complicated the same way when the machine is behind
> a firewall or proxy, I am afraid. It's a pity Windows does
> not have a standard mai
On November 11, 2003 05:53 am, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Sounds good enough. The question was about the Makefile,
> though. I don't know the build system, unfortunately, so I
> don't even know if it has the necessary basis for this.
It has no basis for it, I guess we'll just need to create
differen
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:18:20AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> 4. Did Jon Bright contribute his SMTP client in the end?
>>We could as well use it... Or would it be better (more
>>reliable) to POST it through HTTP?
>
> I think he did but...
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks good, but why did you change it from a cui to a gui?
> I guess it's fine, we will want to go down that path
> eventually...
Er, I did not. I think it has been a gui ever since its
birth...
>> 1. How to integrate cross compilation into the M
On November 10, 2003 10:18 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I am making slow progress with this thing. It grew sort of
> usable: can be cross compiled and run to produce sensible
> output (tested on XP only). Present questions:
Looks good, but why did you change it from a cui to a gui?
I guess it's fi
Hello,
I am making slow progress with this thing. It grew sort of
usable: can be cross compiled and run to produce sensible
output (tested on XP only). Present questions:
1. How to integrate cross compilation into the Makefile?
2. It is possible to compile this as a Winelib application,
but
