Hello Nikolay,
On 08/27/2013 12:16 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> +static OLEMISC get_olemisc_value(const WCHAR *str, int len)
> +{
> +int min, max;
> +
> +min = 0;
> +max = sizeof(olemisc_values)/sizeof(struct olemisc_entry) - 1;
> +
> +while (min <= max)
> +{
> +int n, c;
Nikolay Sivov writes:
> +static OLEMISC get_olemisc_value(const WCHAR *str, int len)
> +{
> +int min, max;
> +
> +min = 0;
> +max = ARRAY_SIZE(olemisc_values) - 1;
> +
> +while (min <= max)
> +{
> +int n, c;
> +
> +n = (min+max)/2;
> +
> +c = memcmp(ole
On 8/26/2013 19:04, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Nikolay Sivov writes:
+while (min <= max)
+{
+int n, c;
+
+n = (min+max)/2;
+
+c = strncmpW(olemisc_values[n].name, str, len);
strncmp isn't enough.
Right, thanks.
Nikolay Sivov writes:
> +while (min <= max)
> +{
> +int n, c;
> +
> +n = (min+max)/2;
> +
> +c = strncmpW(olemisc_values[n].name, str, len);
strncmp isn't enough.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
