Alexandre Julliard wrote:
A quick fix is to add more free list entries, and in particular an
entry for very small blocks since your test case seems to create a lot
of them. Something like this seems to work well:
Thank you Alexandre, this patch speeds up HomeSite a lot. It's still not
as fast
Michael Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> HomeSite's syntax checker needs 120 seconds to load on Wine because of
> Wine's poor heap implementation. Most users will think that the
> program has crashed. I have created a trace of HomeSite's memory
> requests and a program to replay them. For de
On 18.07.2006 23:21, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have discovered that Wine's heap implementation (HeapAlloc(),
> HeapFree(), etc. in dlls/ntdll/heap.c) is very slow if many small memory
> blocks are allocated and freed. Somebody has reported this before:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/w
Hi,
I have discovered that Wine's heap implementation (HeapAlloc(),
HeapFree(), etc. in dlls/ntdll/heap.c) is very slow if many small memory
blocks are allocated and freed. Somebody has reported this before:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-February/034095.html
HomeSite's synt
