Re: ntdll: Do not execute callbacks past DeleteTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)

2012-10-30 Thread Alexandre Julliard
writes: > You know this patch from March this year. Initially, this patch was > the first of 2-3. I decided to release it on its own after finding > out yesterday that in July, Fran,cois Gouget added a todo_wine for a > bug that I fixed monthes earlier! Now I had to augment my patch > with a o

ntdll: Do not execute callbacks past DeleteTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)

2012-10-26 Thread Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle
Hi, Your paranoid android wrote: [what am I? A human answering a bot!?!] >=== WVISTAADM (32 bit sync) === >sync.c:946: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer That's a flaky test already known from: http://test.winehq.org/data/6ae3418aaf873b85f4508a8920e565d039e7b817/2000_fg-win2000-ie6/kernel32:sync

Re: ntdll: Do not execute callbacks past DeleteTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)

2012-10-26 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22495 Your paranoid android

ntdll: Do not execute callbacks past DeleteTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE).

2012-03-09 Thread Joerg-Cyril . Hoehle
Hi, >callbacks are running in Wine even after >DeleteTimerQueue(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE). I've attached to bug #30071 tests that show the bug and fail in unpatched Wine. Regards, Jörg Höhle