Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Byeong-Sik Jeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Changelog:
> >Use the more explicitly UNICODE character type.
>
> Then you have to simultaneously explicitly start using unicode Win32 APIs.
Yes. I agree.
> I'd suggest you to start with the application that presuma
"Byeong-Sik Jeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changelog:
Use the more explicitly UNICODE character type.
Then you have to simultaneously explicitly start using unicode Win32 APIs.
I'd suggest you to start with the application that presumably doesn't
work properly in multibyte locales and wh
