Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes

2004-04-26 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmm, thinking about it, even more so, shouldn't we also be > compatible with that? I mean, if it was defined by them, we > shouldn't define it again, no? It shouldn't hurt to redefine it, unless the definitions are not compatible, in which case we

Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes

2004-04-26 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Unfortunately _WCHAR_T_DEFINED is also used by gcc in stddef.h. Hmmm, thinking about it, even more so, shouldn't we also be compatible with that? I mean, if it was defined by them, we shouldn't define it again, no? Currently we have this: #ifndef

Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes

2004-04-26 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ChangeLog > > Fix the _WCHAR_T_DEFINED/_WCHAR_T_DEFINED sentries for > > compatibility with the MSVCRT ones. > > Unfortunately _WCHAR_T_DEFINED is also used by gcc in stddef.h. It's OK,

Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes

2004-04-26 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ChangeLog > Fix the _WCHAR_T_DEFINED/_WCHAR_T_DEFINED sentries for > compatibility with the MSVCRT ones. Unfortunately _WCHAR_T_DEFINED is also used by gcc in stddef.h. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]