>This doesn't seem correct to me
You are right, its incomplete, but it also was based on the logic
already in MSVCRT_vswprintf_s, which is just as incomplete!
I'll happily just raise a bug report if the patch is insufficient, but
in general all the _s special processing is missing from the printf
Chris Robinson schrieb:
> This doesn't seem correct to me. According to MSDN, sprintf_s checks for
> valid
> formatting chars (in addition to the buffer and format arguments) and invokes
> an invalid parameter handler if something bad turns up. It then returns -1
> with errno set to EINVAL if e
This doesn't seem correct to me. According to MSDN, sprintf_s checks for valid
formatting chars (in addition to the buffer and format arguments) and invokes
an invalid parameter handler if something bad turns up. It then returns -1
with errno set to EINVAL if execution is allowed to continue. Ad
