larmbr zhan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Andrew Talbot
> wrote:
>> msvcp60: Avoid signed-unsigned integer comparisons.
>
>
> Hi, Andrew Talbot.
>
> I find that you are working on these "Avoid signed-unsigned integer
> comparisons" things
On 03/10/2013 07:00 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 10 March 2013 08:20, larmbr zhan wrote:
But It behaves different when it is signed or not. According to
C Standard,
>>
- For the signed case, once it overflows, resulting in
representing a negative value .
Actually, sign
On 10 March 2013 08:20, larmbr zhan wrote:
>But It behaves different when it is signed or not. According to C
> Standard,
>- For the signed case, once it overflows, resulting in
> representing a negative value .
Actually, signed overflow behaviour is undefined according to the standard
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Andrew Talbot
wrote:
> msvcp60: Avoid signed-unsigned integer comparisons.
Hi, Andrew Talbot.
I find that you are working on these "Avoid signed-unsigned integer
comparisons" things recently.
I DO agree on that using _ unsigned int _ inst
