Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This obviously won't work if the parameter names are different.
>
> However, the procedure to cleanly implement an IDL file with
> compatible parameter names isn't clear to me. I would think we would
> need legal advice as to how to do this.
It's no d
Misha Koshelev wrote:
So I am thinking of implementing some more OLE automation functions and
just wanted to clarify one thing before I start doing this.
Specifically, parameter names can be arbitrary as far as OLE automation
in general is concerned, however for MSI in particular when you use the
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 09:35 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> That would be fine, anything that is required by the interface can be
> the same, so that would mean essentially everything except parameter
> names and help strings. I don't think you need to change the order of
> attributes from what
