> >PS: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ADD YOU COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE NOT ABOVE. IT'S
> >IMPOSSIBLE TO READ.
>
> By default microsoft outlook, hotmail, all add their replies above the
> previous message. It's the way 90% of the email I see works.
Just because billions of flies eat sh*t every day, so should
EA Durbin wrote:
Okay what am i misunderstanding?, explain it to me as its imperative I
learn, and I'd love to learn.
%u is an unsigned integer which is 0 to +32,767.
%u is an unsigned integer which is 0 to +65535.
%i is a signed integer –32,767 to +32,767.
%i is a signed integer -32768
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:14:50 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> So until you show us some code that verifies what you are talking about,
> please stay away from the e-mail clinet.
He has done exactly that though not in a form we can put in the test
suite, and he is not "flaming" anybody. I think you
EA Durbin wrote:
> Okay what am i misunderstanding?, explain it to me as its imperative I
> learn, and I'd love to learn.
>
> %u is an unsigned integer which is 0 to +32,767.
>
>
> %i is a signed integer –32,767 to +32,767.
>
> If the sequence number is always going to be a positive number why
> sh
On Monday, June 05, 2006 12:58, EA Durbin wrote:
> Okay what am i misunderstanding?, explain it to me as its imperative I
> learn, and I'd love to learn.
>
> %u is an unsigned integer which is 0 to +32,767.
>
>
> %i is a signed integer 32,767 to +32,767.
>
> If the sequence number is always going
Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 14:01 -0500, EA Durbin a écrit :
> >
> >Vitaliy.
> >
> >PS: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ADD YOU COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE NOT ABOVE. IT'S
> >IMPOSSIBLE TO READ.
> >
>
>
> By default microsoft outlook, hotmail, all add their replies above the
> previous message. It's the way 90% o
Can you 100% guarantee that documentation is correct? And that there are no
broken apps that will try to pass negative number?
Vitaliy.
Okay, i guess I see your point, but if the broken app passes a negative
number its not going to work correctly anyway, as it will read from the
wrong Disk
Monday, June 5, 2006, 1:01:10 PM, EA Durbin wrote:
>>Both of those depend on the type and not on what it "should be".
>>And the type is INT it's a "signed int".
> Why must it be a signed int, the comparison is always a positive number
> which is an unsigned int. So if we always pass a positive nu
Am Montag, den 05.06.2006, 14:01 -0500 schrieb EA Durbin:
> >And the type is INT it's a "signed int".
> Why must it be a signed int,
Welcome to the World of Microsoft.
Another Example from MS:
A Function is declared to return a BOOL and documented to return
'0', '1' or '2'
We are Compatible,
Vitaliy.
PS: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ADD YOU COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE NOT ABOVE. IT'S
IMPOSSIBLE TO READ.
By default microsoft outlook, hotmail, all add their replies above the
previous message. It's the way 90% of the email I see works.
Both of those depend on the type and not on what i
Monday, June 5, 2006, 11:02:38 AM, EA Durbin wrote:
> As Robert Shearman stated, why give it a 4 byte value when it's using a 2
> byte value.
> The sequence should never be a negative number, where am I mistaken on this?
Both of those depend on the type and not on what it "should be".
And the typ
winehq.org
Subject: Re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
condition operators.
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:14:50 -0600
Why would you add all your findings and "test cases" into the Wine's test
suite?
Until then you should stop flaming list. With all the energy yo
extra 32,767 value range?
From: Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], wine-devel@winehq.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
condition operators.
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01
Mike McCormack wrote:
EA Durbin wrote:
It doesn't use %d currently. It uses %i. And its not to print. It
uses this value in the SQL statement. The LastSequence value of the
Media table is NEVER negative as i pointed out in the MSDN link. It
must always be zero or larger and this is handled
EA Durbin wrote:
It doesn't use %d currently. It uses %i. And its not to print. It uses
this value in the SQL statement. The LastSequence value of the Media
table is NEVER negative as i pointed out in the MSDN link. It must
always be zero or larger and this is handled by passing %u.
Unfortun
y_media_for_files.
>>From: Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], wine-devel@winehq.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
>>condition oper
Re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
condition operators.
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:38:16 +0900
EA Durbin wrote:
I did in fact write a test, which does prove this. Hans has a copy of it,
and i think i sent it to wine-devel too.
I haven't seen any patch for the Wine
EA Durbin wrote:
I did in fact write a test, which does prove this. Hans has a copy of
it, and i think i sent it to wine-devel too.
I haven't seen any patch for the Wine regression test suite as yet, and
that is what I have been asking you to write.
As for files.c, the query in ready_media
D]
Subject: Re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
condition operators.
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:24:00 +0900
EA Durbin wrote:
obviously my patch wasn't "wrong" as you so put it, as this is the same
thing as the one I submitted. I just phrased the definition of i
EA Durbin wrote:
obviously my patch wasn't "wrong" as you so put it, as this is the same
thing as the one I submitted. I just phrased the definition of it wrong
assuming the conditional statements were used by SQL.
Your patch caused the regression tests to fail, and Hans' did not.
err:msi:m
ot;Hans Leidekker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re: msi: Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of
condition operators.
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:07:17 -0700
Hans wrote:
[http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-June/0
Hans wrote:
[http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-June/023395.html]
Fix some copy/paste bugs in the implementation of condition operators.
Congratulations on getting your patch into cvs!
How far does this go towards fixing America's Army
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5139)
22 matches
Mail list logo
