On Mon, 3 May 2010, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 5/2/10 9:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> IActiveScriptSite_OnStateChange is described to return S_OK upon
>> success, so instead of ignoring its return value and unconditionally
>> returning S_OK it strikes me that we should return its result instead.
> I
On 5/7/10 11:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 5/2/10 9:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
IActiveScriptSite_OnStateChange is described to return S_OK upon
success, so instead of ignoring its return value and unconditionally
returning S_OK it strikes me
Hi Gerald,
On 5/2/10 9:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
IActiveScriptSite_OnStateChange is described to return S_OK upon
success, so instead of ignoring its return value and unconditionally
returning S_OK it strikes me that we should return its result instead.
In this case returning S_OK is fi
