Re: mm driver message handling in DefDriverProc

2005-11-12 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Eric Pouech wrote: > * Saulius Krasuckas wrote: > > > > Eric, can't both cases of 1 and DRV_SUCCESS be merged into a single > > case? Maybe this change address some 16-bit issues. No? > > Setting everything as DRV_SUCCESS should be fine. > > But why are you looking at th

Re: mm driver message handling in DefDriverProc

2005-11-12 Thread Eric Pouech
Saulius Krasuckas wrote: * 6 years, 7 months ago Eric Pouech did a change [*]: Started calling mixer as a 32 bit low level driver (no longer 16 bit) Added support for yield proc in mci struct Added mmTaskXXX16 and mmThreadXXX16 functions Refreshed implementation of 16 bit native & asynchronous

mm driver message handling in DefDriverProc

2005-11-12 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* 6 years, 7 months ago Eric Pouech did a change [*]: > > Started calling mixer as a 32 bit low level driver (no longer 16 bit) > Added support for yield proc in mci struct > Added mmTaskXXX16 and mmThreadXXX16 functions > Refreshed implementation of 16 bit native & asynchronous MCI driver command