Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> In fact I was also fixing a spelling error (Arménian -> Arménien) and just
> wondered
> whether I could also convert it into UTF8 (M.Stefaniuc seemed to be OK with
> that).
>
> Or maybe it's safer to just fix the typo without converting character
> encoding at the same
2010/6/1 Alexandre Julliard
> Frédéric Delanoy writes:
>
> > Autogenerated? From which source/using which mechanism?
>
> Actually it's not generated. Still, I'd suggest to leave it alone unless
> there are things that need to be changed in there.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
>
In fact I was als
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> Autogenerated? From which source/using which mechanism?
Actually it's not generated. Still, I'd suggest to leave it alone unless
there are things that need to be changed in there.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> Autogenerated? From which source/using which mechanism?
Have a look at the file history.
> If this is the case, shouldn't there be a comment in the file header that
> says so?
Not necessarily. These data represent what Windows has, there is nothing
to change there.
-
2010/5/31 Dmitry Timoshkov
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
> > >> I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
> > >> 65001 (UTF-8),
> > >
> > > Is there a ny reason behind that?
> >
> > Uniformisation? Universality? All other rc files (at least Fr ones,
> > and most of the o
2010/5/31 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
> If that's the only reason then there is no reasion to bother. On the other
> hand if you are working on translating those files, or adding new translations
> then you are free to choose the file encoding. dlls/kernel32/nls/* files
> are au
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> >> I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
> >> 65001 (UTF-8),
> >
> > Is there a ny reason behind that?
>
> Uniformisation? Universality? All other rc files (at least Fr ones,
> and most of the others) have already been
> converted.
If tha
On 05/30/2010 06:05 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
2010/5/30 Dmitry Timoshkov:
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
65001 (UTF-8),
Is there a ny reason behind that?
Uniformisation? Universality? All other rc files (at least Fr ones,
and
2010/5/30 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
>> I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
>> 65001 (UTF-8),
>
> Is there a ny reason behind that?
Uniformisation? Universality? All other rc files (at least Fr ones,
and most of the others) have already been
co
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
> 65001 (UTF-8),
Is there a ny reason behind that?
> but I've some questions first:
> - most nls files are non-UTF8... is it intended? or just "legacy"?
nls files in Wine use Windows code page approp
Hi folks,
I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
65001 (UTF-8), but I've some questions first:
- most nls files are non-UTF8... is it intended? or just "legacy"?
- can LOCALE_IDEFAULTANSICODEPAGE be set to 65001 or should it be left
at its current "1252" value, i.e. i
11 matches
Mail list logo
