> Wine already had at some point strlen along with some other string
> functions
> implemented in asm, however they have been removed after it was
> proved that
> gcc optimized C code outperforms it.
Let me ask this way, why Wine don't use standard C library functions
for lstringsomething ke
"Adam Strzelecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the further discussion is pointless. If you ever dared to
> look how MSVCRT or GLIBC strlen function is implemented you would know
> that it is exactly same algorithm (that just differs in the
> implementation) using 4 byte fetching wi
