Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes:
>
> Hey Louis,
> Focht is using a pseudonym, and I believe it's Wine policy to
> not accept patches without real names.
> His patches should be used as guides only,
> and should not be reposted to wine-patches,
> until such time as he decloaks.
Well , sorry, i tho
Just to add more clarity to the IPR of computer programs and if it is
legal to decompile and implement a program again.
In Europe, software is protected by Council Directive 91/250/EEC of 14 May
1991 on the legal protection of computer programs
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri
On Dec 2, 2007 9:31 PM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 5:02 AM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2007 5:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hey Louis,
> > > Focht is using a pseudonym, and I believe it's Wine policy to
> > >
On Dec 3, 2007 5:02 AM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2007 5:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Louis,
> > Focht is using a pseudonym, and I believe it's Wine policy to
> > not accept patches without real names.
> > His patches should be used as guides only
On Dec 2, 2007 5:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Louis,
> Focht is using a pseudonym, and I believe it's Wine policy to
> not accept patches without real names.
> His patches should be used as guides only,
> and should not be reposted to wine-patches,
> until such time as he declo
Hey Louis,
Focht is using a pseudonym, and I believe it's Wine policy to
not accept patches without real names.
His patches should be used as guides only,
and should not be reposted to wine-patches,
until such time as he decloaks. If he doesn't
want to decloak, I think we can't use his patches.
I