On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
>> bash-3.2$ make thread.ok
>> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
>> kernel32_test.exe.so thread.c && touch thread.ok
>> err:process:__wine_kernel_init boot e
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM, David Laight wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:40:30PM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
>> [...]
>> > bash-3.2$ make thread.ok
>> > ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
>> > kernel32_test.exe
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
>> bash-3.2$ make thread.ok
>> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
>> kernel32_test.exe.so thread.c && touch thread.ok
>> err:process:__wine_kernel_init boot e
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:40:30PM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
> > bash-3.2$ make thread.ok
> > ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
> > kernel32_test.exe.so thread.c && touch thread.ok
> > err:process:__wine_kernel_
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
[...]
> bash-3.2$ make thread.ok
> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
> kernel32_test.exe.so thread.c && touch thread.ok
> err:process:__wine_kernel_init boot event wait timed out
> assertion "thread->pt_blockgen == thread->pt
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
>> Haven't been able to test real apps yet :-).
>>
>> I'm assuming you want me to test using, e.g., cpu-z?
>
> I was thinking more of checking the traces. It looks like
> dlls/kernerl32/tes
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
[...]
> Haven't been able to test real apps yet :-).
>
> I'm assuming you want me to test using, e.g., cpu-z?
I was thinking more of checking the traces. It looks like
dlls/kernerl32/tests/thread.c (and a couple of others) call
GetSystemInfo(), which s
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
>> Gets it working again on NetBSD (I suspect OpenBSD will as well, but I
>> won't be able to test until probably tomorrow).
>
> Good, I'll update my patch and submit it. Do the results loo
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
[...]
> Gets it working again on NetBSD (I suspect OpenBSD will as well, but I
> won't be able to test until probably tomorrow).
Good, I'll update my patch and submit it. Do the results look good (SSE,
etc)?
--
Francois Gouget http://fgo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
>
>> I submitted OpenBSD's patch for CPU detection a while back
>> (http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067002.html).
>> Francois sent a 'more correct' one
>> (http://www.wine
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Austin English wrote:
> I submitted OpenBSD's patch for CPU detection a while back
> (http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067002.html).
> Francois sent a 'more correct' one
> (http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067382.html),
> but t
I submitted OpenBSD's patch for CPU detection a while back
(http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067002.html).
Francois sent a 'more correct' one
(http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067382.html),
but that one is broken on NetBSD/OpenBSD
(http://bugs.wineh
12 matches
Mail list logo
