André Hentschel wrote:
> +for (r = 0; r < 0x; r++)
> +{
> +if (ignorewchar(r))
> +{
> +markerW[2] = r;
> +todo_wine
> +{
> +ok(!lstrcmpW(markerW, nomarkerW), "expected the character
> 0x%x to be ignored within the st
André Hentschel wrote:
> - Design similar to ntdll/tests/error.c
> - Passes all Machines on WTB
> - with check for existance of function
> - just the known 2 instead of 4510
> - intendation for todo_wine choosen so that it can be easy removed without
> touching the tests
You need to test Compar
André Hentschel wrote:
> +#define TESTMARKER(w) \
> +markerW[2] = w; \
> +ok(!lstrcmpW(markerW,nomarkerW), "expected the character 0x%x to be
> ignored within the string\n", w);
> +
> +static void test_lstrcmpW(void)
> +{
> +static const WCHAR nomarkerW[] = {'t','e','s','t',0
On 04/09/2010 01:12 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
+#define TESTMARKER(w) \
+markerW[2] = w; \
+ok(!lstrcmpW(markerW,nomarkerW), "expected the character 0x%x to be ignored
within the string\n", w);
Hi André,
lstrcmpW is not implemented on Win95/98/Me so these tests will always
su
