Re: kernel32/tests: Verify the stability of CreateTimerQueue.

2012-03-15 Thread Alexandre Julliard
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes: > What do you suggest? > a) remove if(winetest...) and always execute the average test > - Live with occasional failures when the Linux scheduler decides so. >(This is not unlike audio glitches when sometimes, Linux wakes up a thread > after 100ms onl

Re: kernel32/tests: Verify the stability of CreateTimerQueue.

2012-03-15 Thread Joerg-Cyril . Hoehle
Hi, >sometimes one DeleteTimerQueueTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) >fails (presumably with IO_PENDING) because a callback was executing >concurrently. This random failure rose an alarm. I looked at it further and found out that the current testsuite is not complete enough to demonstrate that given IN

Re: kernel32/tests: Verify the stability of CreateTimerQueue.

2012-03-14 Thread Alexandre Julliard
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes: > I've been using > if (winetest_debug > 0) > partly because the trace output in a Gnome-terminal slows down wine such that > the tests fail > -- redirect output to a file and the problem goes away (testbot does this) -- > and partly because make -j can ca

Re: kernel32/tests: Verify the stability of CreateTimerQueue.

2012-03-14 Thread Austin English
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 05:32, wrote: > Hi, > > this should have been labeled [PATCH 3/3] because tests will fail without my > 2 ntdll patches. > > First a note unrelated to my patches: if you run the tests in git in a loop, > sometimes one DeleteTimerQueueTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) > fails (pr