Austin English writes:
> Is there any intention to add that in the near future? Or should I
> file a bug? That's currently the only compiler warning on FreeBSD
> (which is the first we've had in a while)...
I'm not planning to add it, that's why there is a warning, to encourage
someone else to d
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Austin English writes:
>
>> AJ's recent work in this area caused a warning on non-Linux OS's,
>> where this function is not used.
>
> That's on purpose, the function is supposed to be used on other
> platforms too.
Is there any intentio
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Austin English wrote:
>
>> AJ's recent work in this area caused a warning on non-Linux OS's,
>> where this function is not used.
>>
>> Resending with a proper extension.
>
> Why does your patch modify dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
Austin English writes:
> AJ's recent work in this area caused a warning on non-Linux OS's,
> where this function is not used.
That's on purpose, the function is supposed to be used on other
platforms too.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Austin English wrote:
> AJ's recent work in this area caused a warning on non-Linux OS's,
> where this function is not used.
>
> Resending with a proper extension.
Why does your patch modify dlls/ntdll/virtual.c? It seems to me that
this should be separate.
--
Francois Gou
