On 02/23/2010 01:26 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens writes:
hi Alexandre,
Is the idea to now use this function instead of all those different
ones currently present in the tests?
Sure.
I'll keep that in mind when touching those files.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Vriens writes:
> hi Alexandre,
>
> Is the idea to now use this function instead of all those different
> ones currently present in the tests?
Sure.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 02/20/2010 10:52 PM, Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
As I've learned, lstrcmpW doesn't work under Windows 9x, thus it is
not a good choice to test functionality that existed in these version of
Windows. On the other hand, strcmpW is not available on standalone
builds on Windows. However, this funct
On 02/20/2010 10:52 PM, Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
As I've learned, lstrcmpW doesn't work under Windows 9x, thus it is
not a good choice to test functionality that existed in these version of
Windows. On the other hand, strcmpW is not available on standalone
builds on Windows. However, this funct
2010/2/22 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
>
>> +/* strcmpW is avaiable for tests compiled under Wine, but not in standalone
>> + * builds under Windows, so we reimplement it under a different name. */
>> +static inline int winetest_strcmpW( const WCHAR *str1, const WCHAR *str2 )
>> +{
Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
> +/* strcmpW is avaiable for tests compiled under Wine, but not in standalone
> + * builds under Windows, so we reimplement it under a different name. */
> +static inline int winetest_strcmpW( const WCHAR *str1, const WCHAR *str2 )
> +{
> +while (*str1 && (*str1 == *s
